New Legal Protections for Dog Bite Victims in New York: What the Flanders v. Goodfellow Ruling Means for You

Western New York Personal Injury Law Blog

New Legal Protections for Dog Bite Victims in New York: What the Flanders v. Goodfellow Ruling Means for You

In a landmark decision, the New York Court of Appeals has expanded legal protections for dog bite victims in the case of Flanders v. Goodfellow. This ruling marks a significant shift in how liability is determined in dog bite cases across the state—offering greater avenues for injury victims to pursue compensation.

A Brief Overview of the Case

In Flanders v. Goodfellow, the Court of Appeals ruled that a dog owner may be held liable under general negligence principles if they fail to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm caused by their pet. Previously, New York law generally required proof that the dog had a known history of vicious propensities—a high bar that made many valid claims difficult to pursue. With this new precedent, courts may now consider whether a dog owner acted reasonably in controlling or restraining their dog, regardless of the animal’s past behavior.

What This Means for Dog Owners

For pet owners in New York, this ruling underscores a greater responsibility to anticipate and prevent potentially dangerous situations involving their dogs. Simply stating that a dog had never shown aggressive tendencies may no longer shield an owner from liability. Dog owners should take additional care to secure their pets—particularly in public spaces or around visitors—given that the legal threshold for negligence has been clarified and expanded.

What This Means for Dog Bite Injury Victims

This decision offers an important shift for individuals who have been injured by a dog and previously struggled to seek compensation due to strict liability limitations. Under Flanders, dog bite victims may now pursue claims based on general negligence, meaning they can present evidence that the owner failed to act reasonably—such as not using a leash, ignoring prior complaints, or failing to contain a dog known to be territorial or protective.

For victims, this expanded legal standard allows courts to evaluate a broader range of evidence and circumstances, making it easier to demonstrate that an injury could have been prevented. This can be particularly meaningful in cases involving severe injuries, permanent scarring, or emotional trauma resulting from a dog attack.

How Campbell & Associates Can Help

At Campbell & Associates, our team is highly familiar with New York dog bite injury laws and stays current on evolving legal standards like those set in Flanders v. Goodfellow. We work closely with clients to evaluate the circumstances of each incident and assess whether negligence may be a factor. This includes investigating the dog’s history, the environment in which the incident occurred, and whether the owner took reasonable steps to prevent harm.

Our approach involves:

  • Gathering and reviewing medical records and injury documentation
  • Investigating the dog owner’s actions before, during, and after the incident
  • Working with relevant professionals to assess damages and long-term effects
  • Navigating insurance communications and legal filings with care and professionalism

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic, and navigating your legal options can feel overwhelming. Campbell & Associates offers thoughtful guidance for those seeking to understand their rights and pursue fair compensation.

If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to a dog bite, contact Campbell & Associates today to schedule a free consultation. We’re committed to helping you understand your legal options and supporting your recovery process—every step of the way.

Categories

Drop a message

Contact Us

Contact Us

Send us a message and we will contact you within 24 hours.

Contact ×
Contact Us
Email Click-to-call (716) 992-2222

Contact Us

×
Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.